Though procedural rules in administrative proceedings
are less stringent and often applied more liberally, administrative
proceedings are not exempt from basic and fundamental procedural
principles, such as the right to due process in investigations and
hearings. The right to substantive and procedural due process is
applicable to administrative proceedings.16
Well-settled is the rule that the essence of due
process is simply an opportunity to be heard or, as applied to
administrative proceedings, an opportunity to explain one’s side or an
opportunity to seek a reconsideration of the action or ruling complained
of.17
Unarguably, this rule, as it is stated, strips down administrative due
process to its most fundamental nature and sufficiently justifies
freeing administrative proceedings from the rigidity of procedural
requirements.
In particular, however, due process in administrative
proceedings has also been recognized to include the following:
(1) the
right to actual or constructive notice of the institution of proceedings
which may affect a respondent’s legal rights;
(2) a real opportunity to
be heard personally or with the assistance of counsel, to present
witnesses and evidence in one’s favor, and to defend one’s rights;
(3) a
tribunal vested with competent jurisdiction and so constituted as to
afford a person charged administratively a reasonable guarantee of
honesty as well as impartiality; and
(4) a finding by said tribunal
which is supported by substantial evidence submitted for consideration
during the hearing or contained in the records or made known to the
parties affected.18
PO2 RUEL C. MONTOYA, petitioner,
vs.
POLICE DIRECTOR REYNALDO P. VARILLA, REGIONAL DIRECTOR, NATIONAL CAPITAL REGION, POLICE OFFICE and ATTY. RUFINO JEFFREY L. MANERE, REGIONAL LEGAL AFFAIRS SERVICE, respondents.
No comments:
Post a Comment